Cannabis Arrestees Remarkably Non-Violent According to HRW Report

As the general public becomes more and more turned off to marijuana prohibition, certain members of the conservative political establishment cling to the argument that prosecuting marijuana possession allows law enforcement to put potentially violent criminals behind bars. This highly unethical tactic has led NYPD to arrest 500,000 people over the last fifteen years--most of them young blacks or Hispanics--on possession charges.

After 80 years of prohibition, one would expect strong associations between cannabis possession and violent crime (and violent criminals). But despite marijuana’s contraband status, the numbers still don’t add up. On November 23rd, Human Rights Watch published a report  showing that people who enter the criminal justice system with an arrest for public possession of marijuana rarely commit violent crimes in the future.

“We tracked through mid-2011 the criminal records of nearly 30,000 people without prior criminal convictions who were arrested in 2003 and 2004 for marijuana possession… We found that 3.1 percent of them were subsequently convicted of one violent felony offense during the six-and-a-half to eight-and-a-half years that our research covers; 0.4 percent had two or more violent felony convictions. That is, 1,022 persons out of the nearly 30,000 we tracked had subsequent violent felony convictions. Ninety percent (26,315) had no subsequent felony convictions of any kind.”

Perhaps the most astounding finding is not that pot smokers aren’t inherently violent, but that most of these arrestees, after being profiled and prosecuted out of urban minority neighborhoods, and after having their dignities and economic opportunities compromised by a criminal record—enough to make anyone rightfully pissed off— still don’t show up as violent criminals at the end of the day. They must still be smoking pot.

“As long as they keep arresting people, and making them pay such a heavy price for possessing marijuana in public view, New York City officials owe the public an explanation for how those arrests contribute to public safety,” said Issa Kohler-Hausmann, co-author of the report and consultant at Human Rights Watch.

Visit Human Rights Watch 

Featured Partner: Leafbuyer - The Best Marijuana Deals, Save At Your Local Dispensary

Leafbuyer is all about finding you the best ways to save money on your favorite cannabis products. Every day, hundreds of local Marijuana Dispensaries, Head Shops, and Grow Stores help us bring you deals and savings on anything you need. Whether you’re looking to try the latest strain, find the perfect pipe, or start growing your own, Leafbuyer is your one stop shop to find the best marijuana deals in town. Businesses post new offers to Leafbuyer.com every day

Please support our friends

Author: Bryan Basamanowicz

Bryan Basamanowicz makes his living in Vancouver, British Columbia, as a Marijuana Paranoia Management Coach. He wrote a book on his practice-- you can check it out at ParanoidHuman.Com Follow Marijuana Paranoia Management Coaching on twitter facebook

Share This Post On
  • Mike

    haha, Ive got to be honest, did laugh when I read the title to this. I mean I really just cant see how there was any need for a report to be written. It seems like such a 'duh' observation, cant believe this is a key reason against pot. I mean really your telling me those stoners arnt violent criminals!? You mean those people smoking a plant well known for mellowing people out arn't all going to attack me? I mean yeah sure there will be the odd anomaly I suppose but hardly enough to make a case out off. Just seems like very dated propaganda.

    Just me two cents anyways :)

  • Bryan Basamanowicz

    Hey Mike, I think the main point of the study was to emphasize that EVEN WITH cannabis being federally criminal, many people who end up getting prosecuted for cannabis are simply not hard criminals by any stretch of association.

    Sure, very few these days still associate cannabis USERS with violent crime. But there assumptions still exist (often times made by law-enforcement and politicians) that when there's smoke there's fire. Ie, that people who end up getting busted for criminal possession of pot are generally in closer proximity to more sinister crime.

    So anyhow, the study caught my eye, because it really drives home the point that cannabis offenders, despite their willingness to "break the law," are simply not criminals by nature. Common sense? Perhaps. But a clear illustration nevertheless of how wrong we are legally with respect to our attitude toward's cannabis' societal harm.