Since re-legalization arrived in Colorado and Washington we have all been waiting for a sign from the great and powerful Washington, D.C. Maybe this was it? Follow along:
“Federal prosecutors will crack down on recreational marijuana dispensaries and growers even in states where they are legal, U.S. drug czar Gil Kerlikowske told a Canadian news magazine this week. The statement appears to be the first from a federal official to state explicitly that the federal government will prosecute dispensaries and producers once they are licensed in Washington and Colorado. During an interview on 20/20, President Obama told Barbara Walters only that the federal government has “bigger fish to fry” than going after recreational users, but did not address those who produce or distribute marijuana. MacLean’s reports:
Q: In the November elections, two states—Washington and Colorado—voted to legalize marijuana for recreational use. President Obama has said that the U.S. government has “bigger fish to fry” than to go after recreational users in states where it is legal. Where do things stand with regard to producers and distributors of marijuana, which is still illegal under federal law?
A: You’ll continue to see enforcement against distributors and large-scale growers as the Justice Department has outlined. They will use their limited resources on those groups and not on going after individual users.
. . .
“In states where medical marijuana is legal, federal prosecutors and Drug Enforcement Administration agents have ratcheted up crackdowns of those distributing medical marijuana in seeming compliance with state laws. And Kerlikowske’s statement suggests the federal government will take the same approach to the recreational marijuana laws, in spite of growing public support for state marijuana legalization in the wake of the November election.
Neither Attorney General Eric Holder, nor other representatives from the DOJ or DEA have spoken publicly about their planned approach, other than to issue a statement immediately following the ballot initiatives’ passage saying that enforcement of federal law “remains unchanged.”
. . .
The best way to eliminate this threat would be to amend the federal Controlled Substances Act, which the executive branch remains responsible for enforcing. Members of Congress proposed bills last week to regulate and tax marijuana like alcohol in those states where it is legal. Last session, other bills proposed simply exempting those states with marijuana laws from the Controlled Substances Act, and Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said he was open to decriminalizing marijuana. But given congressional inaction on absolutely everything, it will likely fall to prosecutors to decide how the law gets applied.
* * * / * * *
So, is it going to be business pretty much as usual? That decision will encourage a non-centralized, amorphous type of system where there would be so many small sources of quality product that there would be no place or need for large commercial providers of that same product. Now, does that sound like the America you know?
Re-legalization is coming and so is America making a buck off of it. If I were smart and cared about quality product (my own), I’d learn to grow my own and be in charge of my supply. Once its’ re-legal, why not? It’s also got to be cheaper.
Original and more complete post is HERE.
[image: Google images White House]
Featured Partner: Nugg - Fast & easy online cannabis delivery to SoCal
Nugg makes it easy to order medical marijuana delivery from hundreds of dispensaries in California. Browse thousands of products & Get $20 off your first order when you use code “FREEWEED”